Seven Youths Pranksters, arrested in Bengaluru For Scaring People Dressed As Ghost||Will CJI Rajan Gogoi Come Under The Ambit Of Right to Information (RTI)?||A 7-year-old girl goes missing found dead in a neighbor's house||In Road Accident Two Died And Five Others Injured At Ranga Reddy District of Telangana||A groom committed suicide by hanging from a ceiling fan, before three hours his wedding||Hyderabad's Shabaz Ahmed Boxer achieved the Gold Medal in 6th United International Games 2019||Raping and Murdering a six-year-old girl in Chittoor, Police released a sketch of the suspect||In Maharashtra Shiv Sena will form a government with the Congress-Nationalist Congress Party||Two Trains Collide at Kachiguda Railway Station Hyderabad||Two students drowned, and three others missing In Andhra Pradesh Kalingapatnam Beach
Breaking News

Historic Judgment: Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas Gets Disputed Site, Muslims To Get Alternate Land :Supreme Court Delivers

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court of India in its Historic Judgment on Saturday on the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute has declared that the entire 2.77 disputed land will be given to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas under a trust that has to be formed by the Center within 3 months time. The Sunni Waqf Board will get alternate land of 5 acres within Ayodhya to build a mosque. While delivering the Judgment, the Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi said that the “Judgment is unanimous” by the Division Bench comprising 5 Judges- DY Chandrachud, Justices SA Bobde, S Abdul Nazeer and Ashok Bhushan. The Supreme Court clearly mentioned that the disputed land will be given to Ram Janmabhoomi Nayas with a trust to be formed by the Center within 3 months to monitor the construction of Ram Temple.


The bench upheld the report of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), which concluded that there was a temple at the disputed site. There is clear evidence that Hindus believe that Ram was born in a controversial place. The SC has dismissed a petition filed by the All India Shia Personal Law Board which stated the disputed land belongs to them. The petition filed by Nirmohi Akhara was also dismissed.

The Chief Justice made it clear that the decision was on a historic basis, legal aspects and religious. As per the verdict the Muslim’s Babri Masjid was not built on the vacant land.

The Ayodhya title suit verdict comes nine years after the 2:1 judgment of the Allahabad High Court that ordered a three-way division of the disputed 2.77 acres of land between the three parties — Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board and the Nirmohi Akhara. The Lucknow Bench of the High Court, on 30th September 2010, held that Muslims and Hindus as joint title holders of the disputed land.

Delivering the verdict, the SC also said archaeological excavations suggest that there was an underlying structure under the Babri Masjid which was “not of Islamic origin”. It said the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) could not suggest that there was a temple of the 12th century at the disputed site. It said the ASI has not specifically said that the underlying structure was a temple.

Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi said the ASI report has left unanswered a critical part of its remit i.e. whether a Hindu temple was demolished to construct the Babri Masjid. The Supreme Court said there is no archaeological evidence of what existed between the 12th century and the 16the century when the Babri Masjid was built.

Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi while reading the verdict and said that it was inappropriate for the court to go into the domain of theology. The Supreme Court has made it clear that the land title must be decided only on legal principles.

You might also like More from author

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.